The New Abnormal

It’s remarkable how pervasive ‘New Normal’ thinking still is, despite innumerable economic and financial market shocks. Forecasters continue to assume that the global economy will gravitate towards low but stable growth, regulators still aim to deliver a more stable financial system, and central banks keep aspiring to ‘normalise’ policy after years of radical improvisation. Yet, as I argue in a report entitled ‘The New Abnormal’ such thinking is in for a few surprises. The world is still far from any sensible definition of ‘normal’.

The idea of a New Normal glosses over several sources of instability. The New Abnormal is characterised by on-going structural changes that extend beyond the decade-long challenge of reforming the financial system. Economic policy is unbalanced, with monetary policy forced into the role of supporting economic growth in the face of headwinds from fiscal consolidation and tightening financial regulation.

Sadly, unconventional monetary policy interventions, such as quantitative easing, have enjoyed more success in boosting asset prices than economic growth. As a result moves to ‘normalise’ interest rates could turn out to be much bumpier than the markets expect. As a result, there is a serious risk that financial market volatility will spill over into the real economy. Indeed, market volatility and weak growth could easily become mutually-reinforcing. To the extent that central banks recognise this, this will make the road to higher rates as much ‘market dependent’ as ‘data dependent’.

Meanwhile, the reluctance of policy-makers to embrace growth-enhancing fiscal and structural reforms is deterring the investment that could stimulate a surprisingly robust upswing in the longer term. The upside of the volatility of the New Abnormal, in contrast to the fashionable miserablism of the New Normal crowd, is that there is potential for positive surprises in the longer term. As I’ve argued before, a host of new technologies offer the potential for positive network effects and answers for the demographic challenges to global growth. But it remains to be seen whether the shock of another recession will be required to trigger the shifts in economic policy that might give business the confidence to embrace that potential.


About markcliffe

Board Advisor and Thought Leader on the impact of disruptive change. Former Chief Economist of ING Group
This entry was posted in Bond Markets, Economic Growth, EMU, Innovation, Macro, Macroeconomics, Productivity, Technology, Uncategorized, US Treasury Bonds and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The New Abnormal

  1. Floesh says:

    Dear mr Cliffe,

    I also work for ING and would truly enjoy a lunch/conversation with you.

    The demise of the middle class is not only caused by the loss of jobs due to new technologies (robotisation and automation), but is a direct result of financial repression caused by the World Central Banks due to unlimited printing of fiat currency. Savers and pensioners are being punished due to ZIRP (zero interest-rate policy).

    People stating that the U.S. has been successful with this policy ignore the fact that 20% of the households (or 49 million out of 350 million citizens) are living on food-stamps. Unfunded liabilities like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security programs are a huge burden on government obligations. We could see in Detroit it can’t be paid. The official unemployment rate (U3) of 5,6% is not reliable because many people are not counted. Meanwhile the U6-unemployment rate, which include discouraged workers and forced part-time workers, is at 11,3%. And the Labor Force Participation Rate (what really matters) is at a 29-year low.

    What we are truly talking about here is facing the Keynesian endgame with a worldwide collapse of the monetary system. The austerity mind set is already a passed station and we can expect QE4 in the beginning of 2016.

    Debt-to-GDP ratio’s (or more meaningful; Debt to Central Government Tax Revenue ratio’s) of all developed countries are much higher than in 2008, nothing has changed in it’s core.

    In my oppinion, we cannot solve a debt problem by printing more debt. It has never succeeded before in monetary history. I think we should get ready for a world currency like the IMF’s Special Drawing Right (SDR).

    I enjoy reading your blog, thank you for that.

    With kind regards,

  2. Pingback: The new normal that never was - Insord

  3. Pingback: New Horizons Beyond ING | Mark Cliffe

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s